Nice article overall but some caveats. There are arguments I disagree with. Women share the same genetic and psychological make-up. Your claim that there are some normal women who don't get attracted to Alphas and dominant Men are false. Sensible Men know that being a beta or a simp doesn't generate genuine sexual attraction in any woman.
Besides calling people like Tates and kelvin Samuels manosphere idiots is a disservice to them. they don't make the rules, they only follow the natural laws for their own endgames.
Andrew Tate and Kelvin Samuel are horrific examples for young men who want to become anything positive in society. Just like people have different heights, different personalities, and different interests, so are people attracted by different things. Saying this applies to all women is like saying all men are pedophiles. I think that’s clear enough.
if you are truly knowledgeable as you claimed, you should know that reality doesn't give a fuck about your morals, principles or feelings. I made mentioned that most women are attracted to the unorthodox, to the heterodox, to the bad boys and not necessarily psychopaths, and that's true considering evolutionary biology plus innumerable anecdotal evidence from Men across the globe. Never has it been said, or seen that being conventionally nice or moral is what stimulate sexual attraction in women, you can either embrace the truth, or wallow in your blue pilled delusions. As regards Andrew Tate and kelvin Samuels, you should know that life is not black and white, and if you wish to achieve any measure of success in any sphere of life whether financial or sexually, you have to step beyond the boundaries of conventional morality. Tate and kelvin have their own positives and negatives, relegating them using only their negatives is disingenuous and hypocritical. YOU CAN EITHER LEARN OR PERISH!!!!!!!
Very interesting article. Well done.
Nice article overall but some caveats. There are arguments I disagree with. Women share the same genetic and psychological make-up. Your claim that there are some normal women who don't get attracted to Alphas and dominant Men are false. Sensible Men know that being a beta or a simp doesn't generate genuine sexual attraction in any woman.
Besides calling people like Tates and kelvin Samuels manosphere idiots is a disservice to them. they don't make the rules, they only follow the natural laws for their own endgames.
Andrew Tate and Kelvin Samuel are horrific examples for young men who want to become anything positive in society. Just like people have different heights, different personalities, and different interests, so are people attracted by different things. Saying this applies to all women is like saying all men are pedophiles. I think that’s clear enough.
if you are truly knowledgeable as you claimed, you should know that reality doesn't give a fuck about your morals, principles or feelings. I made mentioned that most women are attracted to the unorthodox, to the heterodox, to the bad boys and not necessarily psychopaths, and that's true considering evolutionary biology plus innumerable anecdotal evidence from Men across the globe. Never has it been said, or seen that being conventionally nice or moral is what stimulate sexual attraction in women, you can either embrace the truth, or wallow in your blue pilled delusions. As regards Andrew Tate and kelvin Samuels, you should know that life is not black and white, and if you wish to achieve any measure of success in any sphere of life whether financial or sexually, you have to step beyond the boundaries of conventional morality. Tate and kelvin have their own positives and negatives, relegating them using only their negatives is disingenuous and hypocritical. YOU CAN EITHER LEARN OR PERISH!!!!!!!
interesting